Situación jurisprudencial en torno a los permisos municipales de uso u ocupación de bienes nacionales de uso público
Date
2023
item.contributor.advisor
item.page.orcidurl
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Universidad Finis Terrae (Chile) Facultad de Derecho
item.page.isbn
item.page.issn
item.page.issne
item.page.doiurl
Abstract
El Presente artículo, busca exponer la corriente jurisprudencial Administrativa de la Contraloría General de la República y de los Tribunales Superiores de Justicia, a la hora de conocer sobre acciones y/o recursos asociados a los permisos municipales de uso u ocupación otorgados sobre bienes nacionales de uso público por las municipalidades a la luz del artículo 36 de la LOCM. Lo anterior, orientado especialmente a visualizar la postura de la Jurisprudencia sobre la esencia precaria de dichos permisos y la facultad discrecional de los alcaldes para otorgarlos, modificarlos y/o revocarlos, en el sentido de determinar si, a la hora de revocar un permiso municipal, basta la mera referencia a la esencia precaria de estos, o bien, debe igualmente fundamentarse esa decisión en los hechos y en el derecho.
This article means to state the jurisprudential tendency of the Administrative and Superior Courts ofJustice, when it comes to know about actions and / or resources associated with use or occupation of township permits granted on national assets for public use by townships in view of the article 36 of the LOCM. The aforementioned is aimed especially at visualizing the position of the Jurisprudence on the precarious essence of said permits and the discretional power of mayors to grant, modify and revoke them, in the sense of determining whether, at the time of revoking a township permit, the mere reference to the precarious essence of these is sufficient, or, if that decision should also be substantiated by the law.
This article means to state the jurisprudential tendency of the Administrative and Superior Courts ofJustice, when it comes to know about actions and / or resources associated with use or occupation of township permits granted on national assets for public use by townships in view of the article 36 of the LOCM. The aforementioned is aimed especially at visualizing the position of the Jurisprudence on the precarious essence of said permits and the discretional power of mayors to grant, modify and revoke them, in the sense of determining whether, at the time of revoking a township permit, the mere reference to the precarious essence of these is sufficient, or, if that decision should also be substantiated by the law.
Description
Tesis (Magíster en Derecho Público: Transparencia, Regulaciones y Control)--Universidad Finis Terrae, 2023
item.page.coverage.spatial
Santiago, Chile
item.page.sponsorship
Citation
Keywords
DOMINIO PÚBLICO -- CHILE, DERECHO MUNICIPAL -- CHILE, BIENES NACIONALES DE USO PÚBLICOS -- CHILE
item.page.dc.rights
Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Chile (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 CL)