1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Patient and Cross-Disciplinary Expert Single-Round Surveys

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorLin, Guo-Hao.
dc.contributor.authorBrunello, Giulia
dc.contributor.authorJung, Ronald E.
dc.contributor.authorKopp, Ina
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, Frank
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.contributor.authorStrauss, Franz J.
dc.coverage.spatialReino Unido
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-14T18:49:02Z
dc.date.available2026-08-14T18:49:02Z
dc.date.issued2026-02
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To gather perspectives from patients and cross-disciplinary experts on treatment practices and outcomes in managing the edentulous maxilla to inform a structured consensus process and highlight areas for future research. Materials and Methods: An 18-item single-round survey was distributed in November 2024 with 68 patients and 68 cross-disciplinary experts. Participation was voluntary, anonymous, incentive-free, and required informed consent. Consensus was defined as >75% and ≤95% agreement or disagreement, and strong consensus as >95% agreement or disagreement. Results: Response rates were 60.3% among patients, and 30.9% among cross-disciplinary experts. Consensus or strong consensus was achieved by patients on 15 statements across nine items and by cross-disciplinary experts on 15 statements across eight items. Items reaching consensus included the use of cone-beam computed tomography, preference for fixed full-arch prostheses, major treatment outcomes, need for hard tissue augmentation, home care regimens, dental implant lifespan, procedure difficulty, cost-effectiveness, and patient-reported outcomes. Both groups also highlighted the need for further research on full-arch implant rehabilitation of the maxilla. Conclusion: Findings from both surveys inform the development of clinical practice guidelines in treating the edentulous maxilla by providing valuable perspectives from patients and cross-disciplinary experts. Areas lacking consensus illustrate real-world variations in treatment approaches, highlight knowledge gaps in the current literature, and reveal important differences among patient expectations, expert opinions, and available evidence.
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 37, N° 30 (2026) pp. 188-203
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70023
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
dc.identifier.issn1600-0501
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2280-8480
dc.identifier.other41732067
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12254/7706
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Chile (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 CL)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/cl/
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectpatient participation
dc.subjectstakeholder participation
dc.subjectsurvey
dc.title1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Patient and Cross-Disciplinary Expert Single-Round Surveys
dc.typeArticle
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: Patient and Cross-Disciplinary Expert Single-Round Surveys
Tamaño:
997.96 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
347 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos de Revistas