Examinando por Autor "Milos Brandenberg, Daniel"

Mostrando 1 - 4 de 4
  • Miniatura
    Ítem
    Association between the Anatomical Location of Glioblastoma and Its Evaluation with Clinical Considerations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    (MDPI, 2024-05-07) Valenzuela Fuenzalida, Juan José; Moyano Valarezo, Laura; Silva Bravo, Vicente; Milos Brandenberg, Daniel; Orellana-Donoso, Mathias; Nova Baeza, Pablo; Suazo Santibáñez, Alejandra; Rodríguez Luengo, Macarena; Oyanedel Amaro, Gustavo; Sanchis Gimeno, Juan; Gutiérrez Espinoza, Héctor
    Background: Glioblastoma is a primary malignant brain tumor; it is aggressive with a high degree of malignancy and unfavorable prognosis and is the most common type of malignant brain tumor. Glioblastomas can be located in the brain, cerebellum, brainstem, and spinal cord, originating from glial cells, particularly astrocytes. Methods: The databases MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and CINAHL were researched up to January 2024. Two authors independently performed the search, study selection, and data extraction. Methodological quality was evaluated with an assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA). The statistical mean, standard deviation, and difference of means calculated with the Student's t-test for presence between hemispheres and presence in the frontal and temporal lobes were analyzed. Results: A total of 123 studies met the established selection criteria, with a total of 6224 patients. In relation to the mean, GBM between hemispheres had a mean of 33.36 (SD 58.00) in the right hemisphere and a mean of 34.70 (SD 65.07) in the left hemisphere, due to the difference in averages between hemispheres. There were no statistically significant differences, p = 0.35. For the comparison between the presence of GBM in the frontal lobe and the temporal lobe, there was a mean in the frontal lobe of 23.23 (SD 40.03), while in the temporal lobe, the mean was 22.05 (SD 43.50), and for the difference in means between the frontal lobe and the temporal lobe, there was no statistically significant difference for the presence of GBM, p = 0.178. Conclusions: We believe that before a treatment, it will always be correct to know where the GBM is located and how it behaves clinically, in order to generate correct conservative or surgical treatment guidelines for each patient. We believe that more detailed studies are also needed to show why GBM is associated more with some regions than others, despite the brain structure being homologous to other regions in which GMB occurs less frequently, which is why knowing its predominant presence in brain regions is very important.
  • Miniatura
    Ítem
    Association between types of abdominopelvic cancer in patients with situs inversus total: Systematic review
    (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc., 2024-02-23) Milos Brandenberg, Daniel; Koscina, Zmilovan; Avila Sepulveda, Roberto; Baez, Belén; Perez Jimenez, Daniela; Nova Baeza, Pablo; Orellana-Donoso, Mathias; Bruna Mejías, Alejandro
    Background: Situs inversus is a rare congenital anatomical variant that involves a group of anomalies regarding the arrangement of intrathoracic and intraabdominal organs. Being able to find in the abdominal region the liver, gallbladder, inferior vena cava, and head of the pancreas and ascending colon on the left side of the abdomen, while on the right side there is the spleen, the stomach, the body of the pancreas, the ligament of Treitz, descending colon among others. In this same way, the thoracic organs, lungs and heart, are changed in their position in a mirror translocation. Methods: We systematically searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, Scopus, and LILACS; the search strategy included a combination of the following terms: "Situs inversus," "Situs inversus totalis," "Cancer," "Neoplasm," "Abdominopelvic regions," and "clinical anatomy." Results: Within the 41 included studies, 46 patients with situs inversus who had cancer, in addition to being found in this organ and in these regions, we also found as a result that the majority of the studies in the research were in stage II; finally, no one study could assert the direct relationship between the situs inversus totalis and the cancer. Conclusion: If our hallmarks could make us think that more exhaustive follow-up of the stomach and other organs should be carried out in these patients, there could also be other predisposing factors for cancer, which is why more studies are suggested to give future diagnostic and treatment guidelines treatment.
  • Miniatura
    Ítem
    Incidence and clinical implications of anatomical variations in the pancreas and Its ductal system: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    (MDPI, 2023-08-09) Orellana-Donoso, Mathias; Milos Brandenberg, Daniel; Benavente-Urtubia, Andoni; Guerra-Loyola, Javier; Bruna-Mejías, Alejandro; Nova-Baeza, Pablo; Becerra-Farfan, Álvaro; Sepúlveda-Loyola, Walter; Luque-Bernal, Ricardo Miguel; Valenzuela-Fuenzalida, Juan José
    Objetivo: Esta revisión sistemática analiza las variantes anatómicas en el páncreas y su sistema ductal para informar sobre su asociación con patologías pancreáticas. Métodos: Realizamos una búsqueda en las bases de datos MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL y LILACS desde su inicio hasta julio de 2023. La calidad metodológica se evaluó con la herramienta Anatomical Quality Assessment (AQUA). Finalmente, la prevalencia agrupada se estimó mediante un modelo de efectos aleatorios. Resultados: Se encontraron 55 estudios que cumplieron con los criterios de elegibilidad. La prevalencia general de páncreas divisum (PD) fue del 18% (IC del 95% = 15-21%). La prevalencia de EP asociada con pancreatitis fue del 30% (IC 95% = 1-61%). Conclusiones: Una variante anatómica del páncreas como la EP puede ser la causa de la obstrucción de la vía biliar, dando lugar a diversas complicaciones clínicas, como la pancreatitis. De ahí que conocer esta variante sea de suma importancia para los cirujanos, especialmente para quienes tratan la región gastroduodenal.
  • Miniatura
    Ítem
    The association between anatomical variants of musculoskeletal structures and nerve compressions of the lower limb: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    (MDPI, 2024-03-26) Valenzuela Fuenzalida, Juan José; Inostroza Wegner, Alfredo; Osorio Muñoz, Francisca; Milos Brandenberg, Daniel; Santana Machuca, Andrés; Nova Baeza, Pablo; Orellana-Donoso, Mathias; Bruna Mejias, Alejandro; Iwanaga, Joe; Sanchis Gimeno, Juan; Gutierrez Espinoza, Héctor
    Objective: The aim of this study was to describe the main anatomical variants and morphofunctional alterations in the lower limb that compress surrounding nervous structures in the gluteal region, thigh region, and leg and foot region. Methods: We searched the Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar, CINAHL, and LILACS databases from their inception up to October 2023. An assurance tool for anatomical studies (AQUA) was used to evaluate methodological quality, and the Joanna Briggs Institute assessment tool for case reports was also used. Forest plots were generated to assess the prevalence of variants of the gluteal region, thigh, and leg. Results: According to the forest plot of the gluteal region, the prevalence was 0.18 (0.14–0.23), with a heterogeneity of 93.52%. For the thigh region, the forest plot presented a prevalence of 0.10 (0.03–0.17) and a heterogeneity of 91.18%. The forest plot of the leg region was based on seven studies, which presented a prevalence of 0.01 (0.01–0.01) and a heterogeneity of 96.18%. Conclusions: This review and meta-analysis showed that, in studies that analyzed nerve compressions, the prevalence was low in the thigh and leg regions, while in the gluteal region, it was slightly higher. This is mainly due to the PM region and its different variants. We believe that it is important to analyze all the variant regions defined in this study and that surgeons treating the lower limb should be attentive to these possible scenarios so that they can anticipate possible surgical situations and thus avoid surgical complications.