1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: A Single-Round Survey on the Number of Implants, Timing of Implant Placement, and Loading for Fixed Restorations.

Vista sencilla de ítem
dc.contributor.authorSchoenbaum, Todd R.
dc.contributor.authorLin, Guo-Hao
dc.contributor.authorBrunello, Giulia
dc.contributor.authorStrauss, Franz J.
dc.contributor.authorSchwarz, Frank
dc.contributor.authorJung, Ronald E.
dc.contributor.authorWang, Hom-Lay
dc.coverage.spatialReino Unido
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-14T19:17:47Z
dc.date.available2026-08-14T19:17:47Z
dc.date.issued2026-02
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To gather the opinions and preferences of experts regarding the number of implants used to support a fixed prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla, timing of implant placement, and timing of implant loading. This was performed using a single-round survey methodology. The primary objective was to support the development of a consensus and contribute to the formulation of clinical practice guidelines for the management of the edentulous maxilla. Materials and Methods: A custom survey instrument was created by a steering committee and team of experts for the 1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines. The anonymous survey was conducted using a single-round survey method. Consensus was defined as >75% and ≤95% agreement or disagreement, and strong consensus as >95% agreement or disagreement. Results: A total of 202 experts from 42 different countries were identified and invited to participate. 117 provided consent and completed the questionnaire, resulting in a response rate of 57.9%. Strong consensus (>95%) reached on no items. Consensus (>75% and ≤95%) reached on four items: always using CBCT for planning, first molar as distal-most implant site for full-arch fixed prosthesis, use of a lab-fabricated acrylic provisional for full-arch fixed prosthesis, and the use of 4 implants to retain a removable maxillary denture. Conclusion: This survey synthesized the preferences and opinions of experts regarding implant number, timing, and loading for the fixed rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla to inform a consensus development process and contribute to the formulation of clinical practice guidelines for the management of the edentulous maxilla.
dc.identifier.citationClinical Oral Implants Research, Vol. 37, N°. 30 (2026) pp. 155–165
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/clr.70016
dc.identifier.issn0905-7161
dc.identifier.issne1600-0501
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-2280-8480
dc.identifier.other41732053
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12254/7708
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Chile (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 CL)
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/cl/
dc.subjectdental implants
dc.subjectimplant loading
dc.subjectimplant timing
dc.subjectnumber of implants
dc.subjectsurvey methodology
dc.title1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: A Single-Round Survey on the Number of Implants, Timing of Implant Placement, and Loading for Fixed Restorations.
dc.typeArticle
Archivos
Bloque original
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
1st Global Consensus for Clinical Guidelines for the Rehabilitation of the Edentulous Maxilla: A Single-Round Survey on the Number of Implants, Timing of Implant Placement, and Loading for Fixed Restorations
Tamaño:
1.42 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descargar
Bloque de licencias
Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
No hay miniatura disponible
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
347 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción:
Descargar
Colecciones
Artículos de Revistas