Barros Di Giammarino, FabiánAmarouch-García, Ismael2025-08-272025-08-272025Congreso Cultura Proyectual: Nuevos paradigmas y didácticas en transformación. Santiago: Chile, (2024) pp. 106-115.9789564171104https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12254/4287This paper proposes to position itself between the criticism of the project or the project as criticism in the context of contemporary Chilean architecture. To choose between an analytical judgement made a posteriori or the recognition of an irreverent, contradictory or changing design strategy. To reinstate the absence of a rigorous critique, that is, as reality is and not as it is proclaimed, or to defend the rupture with the established that, voluntarily or involuntarily, the innovative author provokes. To this end, a research methodology is devised that combines panoramic reading and laboratory testing. Thus, together with a taxonomy of the works based on four design categories, two- and three-dimensional drawings are made which, above all, focus on contextual, formal, spatial and constructive issues. This material provides the basis for an informed scientific criticism that ultimately validates the architect as a critical creator.esAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Chile (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 CL)Arquitectura chilena contemporáneaCríticaProyectoDiscursosCreaciónBook chapterhttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2444-8179https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8471-2843