Pineda, TomásSaffarini, MoKarlsson, JonMusahl, VolkerAyeni, Olufemi R.2026-08-142026-08-142026Journal of ISAKOS, Vol. 19, (2026) 1011402059-7754https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12254/7698Modern orthopaedic practice takes place in a context of information abundance. Clinical trials, national registries, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses are published constantly, producing more evidence than any clinician can follow. Over the past decade, the number of publications in high-impact orthopaedic journals has grown steadily, with post-pandemic years showing a particularly steep increase. One might expect that more evidence leads to better and more objective decisions. However, having access to information does not always guarantee that new studies are interpreted without biasenAtribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 3.0 Chile (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 CL)Confirmation biasOrthopaedic surgeryInformation overloadEvidence-based medicineArticlehttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-9537-0658https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2026.101140